Tag Archives: statistical machine translation

Dictionary = Corpus?

As far as machine translation is concerned, it seems that the best thing is to combine the best of the two approaches: rule-based or statistic-based. If it were possible to converge the two approaches, it seems that the benefit could … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Dictionary = Corpus?

Is rule-based MT more ethical than statistical MT?

In the ongoing debate on safe IA, it is a relevant open question of whether rule-based MT is more ethical than statistical MT. Here are some arguments in favor of rule-based MT in this context (without blaming statistical MT which has its … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Is rule-based MT more ethical than statistical MT?

How rule-based and statistical machine translation can help each other

Here are a few suggestions on how rule-based and statistical machine translation  can help each other: To begin with, rule-based and statistical machine translation are often contrasted and compared: it would be oversimplifying to conclude that one is better than … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why rule-based translation is (presently) best suited to endangered languages

Here are some arguments in favor of the choice of rule-based translation concerning machine translation of endangered languages (it relates to the philosophy of language policy): there does not exist at present time a reliable corpus between the given endangered … Continue reading

Posted in blog | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment